Home | My Profile | Contact Us
Research Trends Products  |   order gateway  |   author gateway  |   editor gateway  
ID:
Password:
Register | Forgot Password

Author Resources
 Author Gateway
 Article submission guidelines

Editor Resources
 Editor/Referee Gateway

Agents/Distributors
 Regional Subscription Agents/Distributors
 
Trends in Soil Science   Volumes    Volume 3 
Abstract
A comparison of two methods for determining soil sulphur based on tracer technique
N. Kurucu, S. Antep, Z. Killic
Pages: 119 - 125
Number of pages: 7
Trends in Soil Science
Volume 3 

Copyright © 2004 Research Trends. All rights reserved

ABSTRACT

A number of methods have been devised for the estimation of sulphur in soils. Unfortunately, none of these methods to date have been accepted as fully satisfactory for all conditions. This study was conducted to compare the Turbidimetric and Atomic Absorbtion Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of extractable soil-sulfate and to evaluate some of the most promising extractants for assessing the availability of SO4-S using a tracer technique as the standard for comparison. Seventeen representative soil samples having a broad range of chemical and physical characteristics were collected. To investigate the S status of these soils, a growth chamber experiment was set up with wheat as the test plant. S was applied as Na2SO4 at the rate of 0 and 20 ppm S (35 mgS/pot). For determining the A-value, the S1 dose was labeled with radioactive-sulphur (2.28 μCi/mgS). After 45 days of growth, plants were harvested and dry matter (g/pot), S content (%), S uptake (mg/pot) determined. Six selected chemical solutions (500 ppm P containing Ca(H2PO4)2H2O and KH2PO4; 0.15 % Cacl2; NAOAc+HOAc; 0.5 MNaHCO3; H20) for determining an index of available soil-S by using two methods were compared with A-value. The highest coefficient of correlation value was obtained with 0.15 % CaCl2 reagent for two methods. This method appeared worthy of consideration as a routine test for assessing the extractable-S for these soils. This study also indicated that AAS method was faster and more reliable than turbidimetric method for determining soil SO4-S.

Buy this Article


 
search


E-Commerce
Buy this article
Buy this volume
Shopping Cart

Quick Links
Login
Search Products
Browse in Alphabetical Order : Journals
Series/Books
Browse by Subject Classification : Journals
Series/Books

Miscellaneous
Ordering Information Ordering Information
Downloadable forms Downloadable Forms